Last reviewed · Written and checked by the Prelims Lab faculty · About 25 min to read
Constitutional government, parliamentary vs presidential, India vs Britain, and the federal and unitary features. Free notes for UPSC CSE Prelims 2027, written around the traps UPSC sets, with the exact text of the Constitution and every past question on the topic.
Parliamentary and Federal System in short
Constitutional government and democracy
Constitutional government means a government whose powers are limited by the constitution. It cannot do whatever it likes; it must respect people's rights.
Parliamentary vs presidential system
Democracies choose how the government (executive) and the law-makers (legislature) relate to each other.
Federalism in India
A federation divides power between a central government and State governments, each with its own area of work. India is federal, but with a strong Centre.
Political parties, pressure groups and coalitions
In a democracy, people organise themselves in two main ways. A political party brings together people who want to win elections and form the government.
How to read: each section has The idea in brief (start here if the topic is new), Exam notes (the facts UPSC tests) and Ranker’s edge (the fine points). Each section opens with the bare text of the Constitution. Open In depth for the story behind it and past questions.
1. Constitutional government and democracy
The idea in brief
Constitutional government means a government whose powers are limited by the constitution. It cannot do whatever it likes; it must respect people’s rights.
Democracy means rule by the people. Abraham Lincoln described it as “government of the people, by the people, for the people”. India is a representative democracy: people elect representatives who make decisions for them. In the Gram Sabha, villagers also take some decisions directly.
Exam notes
Constitutional government
Government limited by the terms of the constitution; it restricts the State’s authority in the interest of individual liberty (PYQ 2014, 2020, 2021)
Democracy’s virtue
It calls into activity the intelligence and character of ordinary men and women(PYQ 2017)
Representative democracy
People rule through elected representatives; India also has some direct democracy at the Gram Sabha level
Concept / thinker
Point
Lincoln
Democracy: government of the people, by the people, for the people
Locke
Government by consent of the governed
Montesquieu
Separation of powers; governments are republican, monarchical or despotic
Robert Dahl
‘Polyarchy’: elected officials, free elections, near-universal right to vote and to run for office, free expression
Morris-Jones
Three idioms of Indian politics: modern, traditional, saintly; ‘bargaining federalism’
Jayaprakash Narayan
Party-less democracy
Almond and Verba
Parochial, subject and participant political cultures
Idea
Details
Direct democracy devices
Referendum, initiative, recall, plebiscite. None exists at the national level in India; some States allow recall of panchayat or municipal heads (for example, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh)
Liberal democracy
Free and fair elections, rule of law, protected rights, independent judiciary, free press, limited government
Harold Laski
“Every State is known by the rights that it maintains”
Rousseau / Hobbes
Rousseau: “general will” and popular sovereignty. Hobbes: absolute sovereign to escape the state of nature
Prelims trap: India is a representative democracy with direct democracy only at the Gram Sabha level; there is no national referendum mechanism in the Constitution.
Remember itConstitutional government = limited government: it “restricts the authority of the State in the interest of individual liberty” (UPSC’s own words, asked three times).
Beyond the basics · ranker’s edge
Concept
Depth
Procedural vs substantive democracy
Schumpeter: competition for votes (procedural). Substantive: rights, equality and dignity, beyond elections
Polyarchy
Robert Dahl’s checklist: elected officials, free and fair elections, inclusive suffrage, right to run, free expression, alternative information, associational autonomy
In depth: the story behind it and how UPSC asks it
The story behind it
UPSC’s questions on “constitutional government” all test one idea: limited government. A country can have a written constitution and still not have constitutional government, if those in power ignore the limits it sets. Constitutional government exists only when power is actually restrained by a higher law, and when courts, elections and a free press enforce those limits.
India’s answer to “who limits the government?” has three layers. The written Constitution sets the limits. Judicial review enforces them. Periodic elections let voters judge those in power. UPSC’s 2021 and 2020 questions both define constitutional government as one that limits the State’s power over the individual. They do not define it as a government that merely has a constitution.
How UPSC asks it
UPSC 2021 Constitutional government means:
A representative government of a nation with federal structure
A government whose Head enjoys nominal powers
A government whose Head enjoys real powers
A government limited by the terms of the Constitution
Show answer(d) A government limited by the terms of the Constitution. Constitutional government is limited government.
UPSC 2020 A constitutional government by definition is a:
government by legislature
popular government
multi-party government
limited government
Show answer(d) limited government. Its powers are limited by the constitution.
UPSC 2017 Democracy's superior virtue lies in the fact that it calls into activity
the intelligence and character of ordinary men and women.
the methods for strengthening executive leadership.
a superior individual with dynamism and vision.
a band of dedicated party workers.
Show answer(a) the intelligence and character of ordinary men and women. Democracy rests on the participation and judgement of ordinary citizens.
UPSC 2014 Consider the following statements: A Constitutional Government is one which:
Places effective restrictions on individual liberty in the interest of State Authority.
Places effective restrictions on the Authority of the State in the interest of individual liberty.
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer(b) 2 only. A constitutional government limits State power to protect liberty.
2. Parliamentary vs presidential system
The bare text
Bare text · Article 74Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
74. Council of Ministers to aid and advise President.—[(1) There shall be a Council of Ministers with the Prime Minister at the head to aid and advise the President who shall, in the exercise of his functions, act in accordance with such advice:] [Provided that the President may require the Council of Ministers to reconsider such advice, either generally or otherwise, and the President shall act in accordance with the advice tendered after such reconsideration.]
(2) The question whether any, and if so what, advice was tendered by Ministers to the President shall not be inquired into in any court.
Amended by: 42nd (1976), 44th (1978) Amendments
Bare text · Article 75Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
75. Other provisions as to Ministers.—(1) The Prime Minister shall be appointed by the President and the other Ministers shall be appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister.
(2) The Ministers shall hold office during the pleasure of the President.
(3) The Council of Ministers shall be collectively responsible to the House of the People.
(5) A Minister who for any period of six consecutive months is not a member of either House of Parliament shall at the expiration of that period cease to be a Minister.
Clauses not relevant here are left out.
Amended by: 91st (2003) Amendment
Reading the text
“Shall … act in accordance with such advice” (Article 74(1)): since the 42nd Amendment (1976) the President is bound by ministerial advice. The 44th Amendment (1978) added one chance to send advice back for reconsideration; after that, the President must act on it.
“During the pleasure of the President” (75(2)) and “collectively responsible to the House of the People” (75(3)) must be read together. In law, ministers serve at the President’s pleasure. In practice, that pleasure lasts as long as the Lok Sabha’s confidence.
“Collectively”: the whole Council of Ministers stands or falls together. That is the principle behind the Cabinet system that UPSC tested in 2017.
“Six consecutive months” (75(5)): a non-member can be a minister, even Prime Minister, but must enter Parliament within six months.
The idea in brief
Democracies choose how the government (executive) and the law-makers (legislature) relate to each other. There are two main models:
Exam notes
Point
Parliamentary (India, UK)
Presidential (USA)
Executive
Two heads: nominal (President) and real (PM and Council of Ministers)
Single executive: the President is head of State and of government
Responsibility
Executive is responsible to the legislature and can be removed by a no-confidence vote (PYQ 2017, 2020)
Fixed term; President not removable by a vote of no-confidence
Membership
Ministers must be members of the legislature (double membership) (PYQ 2013)
Secretaries are not members of Congress
Dissolution
Lower House can be dissolved on the PM’s advice
President cannot dissolve Congress
Strength
Harmony between executive and legislature; responsible government; wide representation
Stability, expert ministers, clear separation of powers
In detail: India has a parliamentary system because the Council of Ministers is responsible to the Lok Sabha(PYQ 2015). The principle of cabinet government is collective responsibility to the people’s House(PYQ 2017). The Cabinet is headed by the Prime Minister, not by the head of State (PYQ 2013).
Feature
Parliamentary system in India
Nominal and real executive
President (nominal) acts on the advice of the Council of Ministers (real), Art 74
Majority party rule
Leader of the majority in the Lok Sabha becomes PM
Collective responsibility
Art 75(3): written into the Constitution (in Britain it is a convention)
Double membership
Ministers belong to both the executive and the legislature
Leadership of PM
PM heads the Council, Parliament’s majority and the party
Dissolution
The Lok Sabha can be dissolved early on the PM’s advice
Secrecy
Oath of secrecy for ministers (Third Schedule)
Semi-presidential model
France: an elected President with real powers and a PM responsible to the legislature. India does not follow it
Prelims trap: Fixed tenure and separation of powers are features of the presidential system, not of India’s.
Remember itParliamentary = responsibility, Presidential = stability. Test for India: is the Council of Ministers collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha (Art 75(3))? Yes, so parliamentary.
Beyond the basics · ranker’s edge
Point
Depth
Why the Assembly chose it
Ambedkar: the parliamentary system prefers “more responsibility to more stability”; daily assessment (questions, motions) beats periodic assessment
Westminster features in India
Nominal and real executive, majority party rule, collective responsibility, political homogeneity, double membership, PM’s leadership, dissolution of the lower House, secrecy of procedure
Articles
74 (Council of Ministers to aid and advise), 75(3) (collective responsibility to the Lok Sabha), 163–164 for States
In depth: the story behind it and how UPSC asks it
The story behind it
The Constituent Assembly seriously considered a presidential system; K.T. Shah argued for it. Ambedkar explained why the drafters chose the parliamentary form. A presidential system gives more stability, he said, but a parliamentary one gives more responsibility. Government is assessed daily, through questions, debates and motions, rather than only once every few years at an election. Given the country’s long experience with parliamentary institutions under the British, the Assembly preferred daily accountability.
How UPSC asks it
UPSC 2020 A Parliamentary System of Government is one in which:
all political parties in the Parliament are represented in the Government
the Government is responsible to the Parliament and can be removed by it
the Government is elected by the people and can be removed by them
the Government is chosen by the Parliament but cannot be removed by it before completion of a fixed term
Show answer(b) the Government is responsible to the Parliament and can be removed by it. The government is responsible to Parliament and can be removed by it.
UPSC 2017 Out of the following statements, choose the one that brings out the principle underlying the Cabinet form of Government:
An arrangement for minimising criticism against the Government whose responsibilities are complex and hard to carry out to the satisfaction of all.
A mechanism for speeding up the activities of the Government whose responsibilities are increasing day by day.
A mechanism of parliamentary democracy for ensuring collective responsibility of the Government to the people.
A device for strengthening the hands of the head of the Government whose hold over the people is in a state of decline.
Show answer(c) A mechanism of parliamentary democracy for ensuring collective responsibility of the Government to the people. Collective responsibility of the government to the people (through the legislature) is the core principle.
UPSC 2017 The main advantage of the parliamentary form of government is that:
The executive and legislature work independently.
It provides continuity of policy and is more efficient.
The executive remains responsible to the legislature.
The head of the government cannot be changed without election.
Show answer(c) The executive remains responsible to the legislature. Responsibility of the executive to the legislature is its main advantage.
UPSC 2015 There is a Parliamentary System of Government in India because the
Lok Sabha is elected directly by the people
Parliament can amend the Constitution
Rajya Sabha cannot be dissolved
Council of Ministers is responsible to the Lok Sabha
Show answer(d) Council of Ministers is responsible to the Lok Sabha. Executive responsibility to the lower House defines the parliamentary system.
UPSC 2013 In the context of India, which of the following principles is/are implied institutionally in the parliamentary government?
Members of the Cabinet are Members of the Parliament.
Ministers hold the office till they enjoy confidence in the Parliament.
The Cabinet is headed by the Head of the State.
1 and 2 only
3 only
2 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3
Show answer(a) 1 and 2 only. The Cabinet is headed by the Prime Minister, not the head of State.
3. Indian vs British parliamentary system
The bare text
Bare text · Article 78Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
78. Duties of Prime Minister as respects the furnishing of information to the President, etc.—It shall be the duty of the Prime Minister—
(a) to communicate to the President all decisions of the Council of Ministers relating to the administration of the affairs of the Union and proposals for legislation;
(b) to furnish such information relating to the administration of the affairs of the Union and proposals for legislation as the President may call for; and
(c) if the President so requires, to submit for the consideration of the Council of Ministers any matter on which a decision has been taken by a Minister but which has not been considered by the Council.
Reading the text
Article 78 writes down what in Britain is only convention: the Prime Minister must keep the head of State informed. It is one of several places where India codified British practice. Britain has no written constitution, so the same relationship there rests on custom.
The idea in brief
India copied the British model but changed it in important ways:
Exam notes
India
Britain
Republic: elected President
Monarchy: hereditary King or Queen
Parliament is not sovereign; limited by a written constitution, Fundamental Rights, federalism and judicial review
Parliament is sovereign; courts cannot strike down its laws (PYQ 2021)
PM can be from either House
PM by convention from the House of Commons
A non-member can be minister for six months
Ministers must be members
No legal responsibility of ministers (no countersignature rule)
Ministers legally responsible for the Crown’s acts
Validity of amendments referred to a Constitution Bench (Article 145(3)) (PYQ 2021)
No written constitution to test against
Point
India vs Britain
Shadow cabinet
Formal in Britain; India has none (only a recognised Leader of Opposition)
Collective responsibility
Written (Art 75(3)) in India; convention in Britain
Upper House
Rajya Sabha is elected by State legislatures; House of Lords is largely appointed and hereditary in part
Courts
Indian courts can strike down laws of Parliament; British courts cannot
Remember itIndia borrowed the engine, not the sovereignty: the cabinet system is British, but India has an elected President, a written Constitution and courts that can strike down Parliament’s laws.
Beyond the basics · ranker’s edge
Point
Depth
Legal responsibility
Britain: a minister countersigns the Crown’s acts. India: no such rule; courts cannot inquire into advice given to the President (Art 74(2))
Constitution Bench
Substantial questions of constitutional interpretation go to at least five judges (Art 145(3)) (PYQ 2021)
In depth: the story behind it and how UPSC asks it
The story behind it: what India kept and what it changed
Point
Britain
India
Head of State
Hereditary monarch
Elected President, for five years
Sovereignty
Parliament is sovereign; no court can strike down an Act
The Constitution is supreme; courts can strike down laws
Where the rules sit
Mostly convention
Largely written into Articles 74–78
Prime Minister’s House
By convention, the Commons
Either House; several PMs have come from the Rajya Sabha
How UPSC asks it
UPSC 2021 We adopted parliamentary democracy based on the British model, but how does our model differ from that model?
As regards legislation, the British Parliament is supreme or sovereign but in India, the power of the Parliament to legislate is limited.
In India, matters related to the constitutionality of the Amendment of an Act of the Parliament are referred to the Constitution Bench by the Supreme Court.
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer(c) Both 1 and 2. Indian Parliament is limited by the Constitution, and constitutional questions go to a Bench of at least five judges (Article 145(3)).
4. Federalism in India
The bare text
Bare text · Article 246Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
246. Subject-matter of laws made by Parliament and by the Legislatures of States.—(1) Notwithstanding anything in clauses (2) and (3), Parliament has exclusive power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List I in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Union List”).
(2) Notwithstanding anything in clause (3), Parliament, and, subject to clause (1), the Legislature of any State *** also, have power to make laws with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List III in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “Concurrent List”).
(3) Subject to clauses (1) and (2), the Legislature of any State *** has exclusive power to make laws for such State or any part thereof with respect to any of the matters enumerated in List II in the Seventh Schedule (in this Constitution referred to as the “State List”).
Clauses not relevant here are left out.
Bare text · Article 248Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
248. Residuary powers of legislation.—(1) [Subject to article 246A, Parliament] has exclusive power to make any law with respect to any matter not enumerated in the Concurrent List or State List.
(2) Such power shall include the power of making any law imposing a tax not mentioned in either of those Lists.
Amended by: 101st (2016) Amendment
Reading the text
“Notwithstanding anything in clauses (2) and (3)”: Article 246 ranks the Lists. The Union List overrides the Concurrent List, which overrides the State List. Where entries overlap, the Union’s power wins.
Article 248 gives the residue, anything not listed, to Parliament. This is the Canadian model; in the US and Australia the residue lies with the states.
“Subject to article 246A” was added by the 101st Amendment (2016) for GST, the first tax both Union and States levy on the same base.
The idea in brief
A federation divides power between a central government and State governments, each with its own area of work. India is federal, but with a strong Centre.
Coming together vs holding togetherThe USA was formed when independent states came together. India was one country that divided itself into States to hold together. That is why Indian States cannot leave the Union.
Exam notes
Federal features
Unitary (non-federal) features
Two governments (Union and States); division of powers (Seventh Schedule); written and supreme constitution; rigid in federal matters; independent judiciary(PYQ 2021); bicameral Parliament
Strong Centre (Union List bigger, residuary powers); States not indestructible; single constitution; flexible constitution; unequal representation in the Rajya Sabha; emergency provisions; single citizenship; integrated judiciary; All-India Services; Governor appointed by the Centre; integrated election machinery
In detail, how scholars describe it: K.C. Wheare: “quasi-federal“. Ivor Jennings: “a federation with a strong centralising tendency”. Granville Austin: “cooperative federalism“. Morris-Jones: “bargaining federalism”. Ambedkar: federal in normal times, unitary in emergencies. In S.R. Bommai (1994) the Supreme Court held federalism is part of the basic structure.
Prelims trap: Indian federation is not the result of an agreement among the units (India is a “holding together” federation; the US is a “coming together” one) (PYQ 2017). An independent judiciary is the essential federal feature; enforceable Fundamental Rights are not a federal feature (PYQ 2021).
Description of Indian federalism
By
Quasi-federal
K.C. Wheare
Cooperative federalism
Granville Austin
Bargaining federalism
Morris-Jones
‘Holding together’ (India) vs ‘coming together’ (USA)
Alfred Stepan
Prelims trap: An independent judiciary and bicameralism are federal features; single citizenship, integrated judiciary, All-India Services and Governors appointed by the Centre are unitary. Federalism was held a basic feature in S.R. Bommai (1994).
Trend
What it means and examples
Cooperative federalism
Centre and States work together: GST Council (Art 279A), NITI Aayog Governing Council, Inter-State Council, Zonal Councils
Competitive federalism
States compete for investment and outcomes; rankings and indices drive it
Fiscal federalism
Vertical imbalance: Centre collects more, States spend more; Finance Commission transfers close the gap
Asymmetric federalism
Different arrangements for some units: Articles 371–371J, Fifth and Sixth Schedules, Delhi (239AA)
Points of friction
Governor’s role and assent to bills, Article 356, All-India Services deputation, central agencies in States, borrowing limits, GST compensation
Prelims trap: “Destructible States, indestructible Union”: Parliament can change State boundaries under Article 3, so States are not indestructible; this is a unitary feature.
Held that the Constitution is not a traditional federation: States are not sovereign, so the Union could acquire State property
Bommai (1994)
Federalism is a basic feature; President’s Rule subject to judicial review; floor test is the way to judge majority
Cooperative federalism
GST Council (279A); NITI Aayog Governing Council. Mohit Minerals (2022): GST Council recommendations are persuasive, not binding on Parliament and States
Competitive federalism
States ranked on indices (SDG India Index, Ease of Doing Business reform action plan, Export Preparedness Index)
Asymmetric federalism
Articles 371 to 371J, Fifth and Sixth Schedules, earlier Article 370
In depth: the story behind it and how UPSC asks it
The story behind it
Scholars have struggled to label Indian federalism. K.C. Wheare called it “quasi-federal”. Granville Austin called it “cooperative federalism”. The design reflects 1947: Partition and the integration of over 550 princely states made the drafters want a strong Centre. Yet the Supreme Court has held federalism to be part of the basic structure (S.R. Bommai, 1994). The GST Council (Article 279A), where the Centre has one-third of the votes and the States two-thirds, is the clearest recent example of shared, cooperative decision-making.
How UPSC asks it
UPSC 2021 Which one of the following in Indian polity is an essential feature that indicates that it is federal in character?
The independence of the judiciary is safeguarded.
The Union Legislature has elected representatives from constituent units.
The Union Cabinet can have elected representatives from regional parties.
The Fundamental Rights are enforceable by Courts of Law.
Show answer(a) The independence of the judiciary is safeguarded. An independent judiciary to resolve Centre-State disputes is an essential federal feature.
UPSC 2017 Which one of the following is not a feature of Indian federalism?
There is an independent judiciary in India.
Powers have been clearly divided between the Centre and the States.
The federating units have been given unequal representation in the Rajya Sabha.
It is the result of an agreement among the federating units.
Show answer(d) It is the result of an agreement among the federating units. India’s federation was not formed by an agreement among the States.
5. Political parties, pressure groups and coalitions
The idea in brief
In a democracy, people organise themselves in two main ways. A political party brings together people who want to win elections and form the government. A pressure group tries to influence the government’s decisions without seeking power itself.
ExampleA farmers’ union that holds protests to get a higher crop price is a pressure group. If it starts contesting elections to form a government, it becomes a political party.
Parties are registered by the Election Commission. Bigger parties are “recognised” as national or State parties and get a fixed symbol for every election.
Exam notes
Political parties
Key points
In the Constitution
“Political party” entered the Constitution only through the Tenth Schedule (52nd Amendment, 1985); there is no separate chapter on parties
Registration
By the Election Commission under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951
Recognition
Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968: national and State parties; others are registered unrecognised parties. “Regional party” is not a legal category
National party test
6% votes in 4 or more States + 4 Lok Sabha seats; or 2% of Lok Sabha seats from at least 3 States; or recognised as a State party in 4 States
State party test
6% votes + 2 Assembly seats; or 6% votes + 1 Lok Sabha seat; or 3% of Assembly seats (minimum 3); or 1 Lok Sabha seat for every 25; or 8% of votes
De-registration
The EC cannot de-register a party for not contesting or for ordinary misconduct; only where registration was by fraud or the party changes its stand on the Constitution (INC (I) v. Institute of Social Welfare, 2002)
Party systems
One-party dominance (“Congress system”, Rajni Kothari) to 1967; coalition era 1989–2014; first non-Congress coalition at the Centre: Janata Party (1977); National Front minority government (1989)
Prelims trap: Parties are registered and recognised by the Election Commission, not by Parliament or the President. A recognised party gets a reserved symbol; registration alone does not.
Pressure groups
Key points
Meaning
Organised groups that try to influence policy without contesting elections to take power (parties seek power)
Business: FICCI, CII, ASSOCHAM. Labour: AITUC, INTUC, BMS, CITU. Farmers: Bharatiya Kisan Union, All India Kisan Sabha. Professional: Indian Medical Association, Bar Council. Students: ABVP, NSUI, AISF
Methods
Lobbying, petitions, media campaigns, strikes, litigation (PIL)
Prelims trap: A pressure group does not contest elections or form a government; if it does, it has become a party.
Remember itParties seek power, pressure groups seek influence. National party numbers: 6% in 4 States + 4 LS seats, or 2% of LS seats from 3 States, or State party in 4 States.
Beyond the basics · ranker’s edge
Point
Depth
Internal democracy
No law requires internal elections in parties; the Law Commission (170th report, 1999) recommended it
Funding
Cash donations above ₹2,000 not allowed (2017); companies donate under Section 182 of the Companies Act; electoral trusts; electoral bonds struck down (2024)
RTI and parties
The CIC (2013) declared six national parties “public authorities” under the RTI Act; the parties have not complied
Clean-up of rolls of parties
In 2025 the Election Commission delisted several hundred inactive registered unrecognised parties
In depth: the story behind it and how UPSC asks it
The story behind it
The Constitution says almost nothing about political parties. The word “political party” entered it only in 1985, with the Tenth Schedule on defection. Yet parties run the parliamentary system: they form governments, choose Prime Ministers and decide how MPs vote.
India’s party system has moved through three phases. First came Congress dominance (1952–67), which political scientist Rajni Kothari called the “Congress system”: one big party containing many factions. Then came competition and coalitions, with the first non-Congress government in 1977 and coalition governments at the Centre for most of 1989–2014. Since 2014, a single party has again been dominant. Each phase changed how the Constitution’s offices worked in practice, for instance how much discretion Presidents and Governors had in choosing a Prime Minister or Chief Minister.
How UPSC asks it
UPSC 2024 Consider the following pairs (Party – Its Leader):
Bharatiya Jana Sangh – Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee
Socialist Party – C. Rajagopalachari
Congress for Democracy – Jagjivan Ram
Swatantra Party – Acharya Narendra Dev.
How many of the above are correctly matched?
Only one
Only two
Only three
All four
Show answer(b) Only two. Rajagopalachari founded the Swatantra Party; Acharya Narendra Dev was a Socialist leader. Pairs 1 and 3 are correct.
6. Quick revision and traps
Exam notes
Why parliamentary?
Because the executive is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha (Article 75(3))
Why limited Parliament?
Written constitution, Fundamental Rights, federal division, judicial review
Quasi-federal
K.C. Wheare
Union of States
Article 1; the word “federation” is not used
Beyond the basics · ranker’s edge
PYQ pattern
How to prepare
Definitions from political theory
NCERT Class XI “Political Theory” and “Indian Constitution at Work”
Federal vs unitary features
Sort every feature into the two columns until it is automatic