Last reviewed · Written and checked by the Prelims Lab faculty · About 75 min to read
Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, presiding officers, sessions, bills, Budget, devices, committees and anti-defection. Free notes for UPSC CSE Prelims 2027, written around the traps UPSC sets, with the exact text of the Constitution and every past question on the topic.
Parliament in short
Composition, members and elections
Parliament is the law-making body of India. It has three parts: the President, the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and the Rajya Sabha (Council of States).
Presiding officers
Each House has a presiding officer who runs the sittings like a referee.
Sessions and passage of bills
Parliament meets in sessions. The President calls (summons) Parliament, and the gap between two sessions cannot be more than six months.
Money Bills and the Budget
A Money Bill deals only with taxes, government borrowing and spending from government funds.
Parliamentary devices and control over the executive
In a parliamentary system, the government must answer to Parliament every day.
Parliamentary committees
Parliament is too big to examine everything in detail, so small groups of MPs called committees do the detailed work.
Powers of the two Houses, privileges and anti-defection
Privileges are special protections for MPs, such as free speech inside the House: an MP cannot be sued for what he says there.
How to read: each section has The idea in brief (start here if the topic is new), Exam notes (the facts UPSC tests) and Ranker’s edge (the fine points). Each section opens with the bare text of the Constitution. Open In depth for the story behind it and past questions.
1. Composition, members and elections
The bare text
Bare text · Article 79Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
79. Constitution of Parliament.—There shall be a Parliament for the Union which shall consist of the President and two Houses to be known respectively as the Council of States and the House of the People.
Bare text · Article 80Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
80. Composition of the Council of States.—(1) [*** The Council of States] shall consist of—
(a) twelve members to be nominated by the President in accordance with the provisions of clause (3); and
(b) not more than two hundred and thirty-eight representatives of the States [and of the Union territories].
(3) The members to be nominated by the President under sub-clause (a) of clause (1) shall consist of persons having special knowledge or practical experience in respect of such matters as the following, namely:— Literature, science, art and social service.
(4) The representatives of each State *** in the Council of States shall be elected by the elected members of the Legislative Assembly of the State in accordance with the system of proportional representation by means of the single transferable vote.
Clauses not relevant here are left out.
Amended by: 7th (1956), 35th (1974) Amendments
Bare text · Article 81Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
[81. Composition of the House of the People.—(1) [Subject to the provisions of article 331 ***], the House of the People shall consist of—
(a) not more than [five hundred and thirty members] chosen by direct election from territorial constituencies in the States; and
(b) not more than [twenty members] to represent the Union territories, chosen in such manner as Parliament may by law provide.
(2) For the purposes of sub-clause (a) of clause (1),—
(a) there shall be allotted to each State a number of seats in the House of the People in such manner that the ratio between that number and the population of the State is, so far as practicable, the same for all States; and
Bare text · Article 84Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
84. Qualification for membership of Parliament.—A person shall not be qualified to be chosen to fill a seat in Parliament unless he—
[(a) is a citizen of India, and makes and subscribes before some person authorised in that behalf by the Election Commission an oath or affirmation according to the form set out for the purpose in the Third Schedule;]
(b) is, in the case of a seat in the Council of States, not less than thirty years of age and, in the case of a seat in the House of the People, not less than twenty-five years of age; and
(c) possesses such other qualifications as may be prescribed in that behalf by or under any law made by Parliament.
Amended by: 16th (1963) Amendment
Reading the text
Article 79: Parliament = President + Council of States + House of the People. The President is part of Parliament but sits in neither House. UPSC’s 1997 question tests this.
Article 80(3) names only four fields for nominated members: literature, science, art and social service. Sport, the usual “trap” addition, is not in the text.
Article 81(2)(a) promises seats in proportion to population “so far as practicable”. But the population figure is frozen: allocation among States still uses the 1971 Census, by the 42nd, 84th and 87th Amendments, until after the first census following 2026.
Article 84(c) leaves other qualifications to law. The RPA, 1951 requires a candidate to be an elector in some constituency in India.
Bare text · Article 334AConstitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
[334A. Reservation of seats for women take effect. — (1) Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provision of this Part or Part VIII, the provisions of the Constitution relating to the reservation of seats for women in the House of the People, the Legislative Assembly of a State and the Legislative Assembly of the National Capital Territory of Delhi shall come into effect after an exercise of delimitation is undertaken for this purpose after the relevant figures for the first census taken after commencement of the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023 have been published and shall cease to have effect on the expiration of a period of fifteen years from such commencement.
Clauses not relevant here are left out.
Amended by: 106th (2023) Amendment
Ins. by the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023, s.5 (date yet to be notified).
The idea in brief
Parliament is the law-making body of India. It has three parts: the President, the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and the Rajya Sabha (Council of States). The President is part of Parliament but does not sit in either House.
Think of it like thisThe Lok Sabha represents the people, so it is elected directly. The Rajya Sabha represents the States, so it is elected by the State legislatures. That is why the Lok Sabha is more powerful on money and on the government’s survival.
Exam notes
Item
Lok Sabha
Rajya Sabha
Maximum strength
550: up to 530 from States, 20 from UTs. (Two Anglo-Indian seats ended in 2020, 104th Amendment)
Indirectly by elected MLAs, single transferable vote; seats in the Fourth Schedule. UTs with seats: Delhi, Puducherry, J&K
Minimum age
25
30
Term
5 years; can be dissolved earlier. In a National Emergency, extendable by law one year at a time, not beyond six months after the Emergency ends
Permanent; one-third retire every second year; member’s term 6 years
In detail:Parliament = President + Lok Sabha + Rajya Sabha (Article 79); the President is not a member of either House (Article 59) (PYQ 1997, 2012). To contest, a person must be a citizen and a registered voter in any constituency (PYQ 2017). A candidate may contest from at most two constituencies (RPA Section 33(7)). Security deposit for Lok Sabha: ₹25,000 (SC/ST ₹12,500) since 2009; it was ₹10,000/₹5,000 earlier (PYQ 2002). No minimum vote share is needed to win (PYQ 2017). Delimitation Commissions: 1952, 1963, 1973, 2002 = four (PYQ 2024); their orders cannot be challenged in court or modified by the House (PYQ 2012).
Disqualification
Rule
Article 102
Office of profit, unsound mind, undischarged insolvent, not a citizen, or disqualified by law. Question decided by the President on the Election Commission’s opinion (Article 103)
Office of profit
Not defined in the Constitution. The Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1959 lists exempt posts (PYQ 2019)
Conviction
RPA 1951: sentence of 2 years or more disqualifies from conviction till 6 years after release; not permanent (PYQ 2020). Lily Thomas (2013) removed the protection for sitting members
Defection
Tenth Schedule; decided by the Speaker/Chairman, not the President (PYQ 2025)
Prelims trap: Nominated members vote in the Vice-President’s election, not the President’s; they can become ministers (PYQ 2003). UTs are represented in the Rajya Sabha (PYQ 2012). Election disputes go to the High Court, not the Election Commission.
Item
Point
Seats
UP 80 Lok Sabha and 31 Rajya Sabha (most); 84 SC and 47 ST seats; Rajya Sabha 245 now (233 + 12 nominated)
Delimitation Commissions
1952, 1963, 1973, 2002 (Justice Kuldip Singh); seat numbers frozen on 1971 Census till after 2026
Disqualification
Article 102; President decides on EC’s opinion (Art 103); Lily Thomas (2013): convicted legislators (2+ years) disqualified at once
Simultaneous membership
Elected to both Houses: vacate one within 10 days; MLA elected MP: resign within 14 days
Remember it550 / 250, 25 / 30, 5 years / permanent: maximum strength, minimum age and term for Lok Sabha / Rajya Sabha. Today 543 and 245. Delimitation Commissions: 52-63-73-2002.
Beyond the basics · ranker’s edge
Point
Depth
Delimitation freeze
42nd Amendment froze seats on the 1971 Census till 2000; 84th (2001) extended it till the first census after 2026; 87th (2003) let boundaries be redrawn on the 2001 Census without changing seat numbers
Census 2027
Includes caste enumeration. House-listing ran April–September 2026; population count with reference date 1 March 2027 (1 October 2026 in snow-bound areas). Seat re-allocation and the women’s quota wait on it
131st Amendment Bill (April 2026)
Sought to raise the Lok Sabha cap from 550 to 850 and bring in women’s reservation through delimitation on the 2011 Census. Defeated in the Lok Sabha on 17 April 2026 (298 for, 230 against: short of two-thirds); the companion Delimitation Bill, 2026 lapsed
Rajya Sabha elections
Domicile requirement dropped and open ballot introduced in 2003; upheld in Kuldip Nayar (2006). Nominees under Art 80(3): literature, science, art, social service
Vacation of seat (Art 101)
Absent for 60 days without permission; MLA elected MP (resign State seat in 14 days, else Parliament seat goes)
Office of profit
Jaya Bachchan (2006): the test is whether the office is capable of yielding profit, not whether pay was actually drawn
Conviction
Lily Thomas (2013) struck down Section 8(4) RPA. Disqualification lifts if the conviction is stayed by an appellate court
In depth: the story behind it and how UPSC asks it
The story behind it
The seat freeze was meant to stop States that controlled population growth from losing seats to States that did not. That bargain has run into the 2026 deadline. Women’s reservation (the 106th Amendment, 2023) was tied to the next delimitation. In April 2026 an attempt to raise the Lok Sabha’s size and advance delimitation, the 131st Amendment Bill, failed to get the two-thirds majority in the Lok Sabha. The official text records Article 334A’s insertion as “date yet to be notified”.
How UPSC asks it
UPSC 2024 How many Delimitation Commissions have been constituted by the Government of India till December 2023?
One
Two
Three
Four
Show answer(d) Four. Delimitation Commissions were set up under Acts of 1952, 1962, 1972 and 2002, i.e., four commissions (working in 1952, 1963, 1973 and 2002).
UPSC 2020 Consider the following statements:
According to the Constitution of India, a person who is eligible to vote can be made a minister in a State for six months even if he/she is not a member of the Legislature of that State.
According to the Representation of People Act, 1951, a person convicted of a criminal offence and sentenced to imprisonment for five years is permanently disqualified from contesting an election even after his release from prison.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer(d) Neither 1 nor 2. 1 is wrong: Article 164(4) lets a non-member be minister for six months, but the person must be qualified to be an MLA (e.g., 25 years old), which is more than being eligible to vote. 2 is wrong: disqualification lasts till six years after release, not permanently.
UPSC 2019 Consider the following statements:
The Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1959 exempts several posts from disqualification on the grounds of 'Office of Profit'.
The above-mentioned Act was amended five times.
The term 'Office of Profit' is well-defined in the Constitution of India.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 and 2 only
3 only
2 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3
Show answer(a) 1 and 2 only. The 1959 Act lists exempted posts and has been amended several times. ‘Office of profit’ is not defined in the Constitution; courts have developed tests for it.
UPSC 2017 For election to the Lok Sabha, a nomination paper can be filed by:
anyone residing in India.
a resident of the constituency from which the election is to be contested.
any citizen of India whose name appears in the electoral roll of a constituency.
any citizen of India.
Show answer(c) any citizen of India whose name appears in the electoral roll of a constituency. Under the RPA, a Lok Sabha candidate must be an elector in any parliamentary constituency in India (plus other qualifications). Residence in the same constituency is not needed.
UPSC 2017 Consider the following statements:
In the election for Lok Sabha or State Assembly, the winning candidate must get at least 50 percent of the votes polled, to be declared elected.
According to the provisions laid down in the Constitution of India, in Lok Sabha, the Speaker's post goes to the majority party and the Deputy Speaker's to the Opposition.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer(d) Neither 1 nor 2. First-past-the-post needs only more votes than any rival, not 50%. Giving the Deputy Speaker’s post to the Opposition is a convention, not a constitutional rule.
UPSC 2012 Consider the following statements:
Union Territories are not represented in the Rajya Sabha.
It is within the purview of the Chief Election Commissioner to adjudicate the election disputes.
According to the Constitution of India, the Parliament consists of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha only.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
2 and 3
1 and 3
None
Show answer(d) None. Delhi, Puducherry (and now J&K) have Rajya Sabha seats. Election petitions go to High Courts. Parliament includes the President (Article 79). So none is correct.
UPSC 2012 With reference to the Delimitation Commission, consider the following statements:
The orders of the Delimitation Commission cannot be challenged in a Court of Law.
When the orders of the Delimitation Commission are laid before the Lok Sabha or State Legislative Assembly, they cannot effect any modifications in the orders.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer(c) Both 1 and 2. Its orders have the force of law, cannot be questioned in court, and the House cannot modify them when they are laid before it.
UPSC 2003 Which one of the following statements is correct?
Only the Rajya Sabha and not the Lok Sabha can have nominated members.
There is a constitutional provision for nominating two members belonging to the Anglo-Indian community to the Rajya Sabha.
There is no constitutional bar for a nominated member to be appointed as a Union minister.
A nominated member can vote both in the Presidential and Vice Presidential election.
Show answer(c) There is no constitutional bar for a nominated member to be appointed as a Union minister. A nominated member can be a minister. The Anglo-Indian seats were in the Lok Sabha (now ended), and nominated members vote only in the Vice-President’s election.
UPSC 2002 In the case of election to the Lok Sabha, the amount of Security deposited for general category candidates and SC/ST category candidates respectively is:
₹5,000 and ₹2,500
₹10,000 and ₹2,500
₹10,000 and ₹5,000
₹15,000 and ₹7,500
Show answer(c) ₹10,000 and ₹5,000. In 2002 it was ₹10,000 and ₹5,000. Note: since 2009 it is ₹25,000 and ₹12,500.
UPSC 2002 The term of the Lok Sabha:
cannot be extended under any circumstances
can be extended by six months at a time
can be extended by one year at a time during the proclamation of emergency
can be extended for two years at a time during the proclamation of emergency
Show answer(c) can be extended by one year at a time during the proclamation of emergency. Article 83(2): one year at a time during a National Emergency.
UPSC 1997 Which of the following is/are stated in the Constitution of India?
The President shall not be a member of either House of Parliament.
The Parliament shall consist of the President and two Houses.
Neither 1 nor 2
Both 1 and 2
Only 1
Only 2
Show answer(b) Both 1 and 2. Article 59(1) says the President shall not be a member of either House; Article 79 says Parliament consists of the President and two Houses.
2. Presiding officers
The bare text
Bare text · Article 93Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
93. The Speaker and Deputy Speaker of the House of the People.— The House of the People shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the House to be respectively Speaker and Deputy Speaker thereof and, so often as the office of Speaker or Deputy Speaker becomes vacant, the House shall choose another member to be Speaker or Deputy Speaker, as the case may be.
Bare text · Article 94Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
94. Vacation and resignation of, and removal from, the offices of Speaker and Deputy Speaker.— A member holding office as Speaker or Deputy Speaker of the House of the People—
(a) shall vacate his office if he ceases to be a member of the House of the People;
(b) may at any time, by writing under his hand addressed, if such member is the Speaker, to the Deputy Speaker, and if such member is the Deputy Speaker, to the Speaker, resign his office; and
(c) may be removed from his office by a resolution of the House of the People passed by a majority of all the then members of the House:
Provided that no resolution for the purpose of clause (c) shall be moved unless at least fourteen days’ notice has been given of the intention to move the resolution:
Provided further that, whenever the House of the People is dissolved, the Speaker shall not vacate his office until immediately before the first meeting of the House of the People after the dissolution.
Bare text · Article 96Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
(2) The Speaker shall have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, the House of the People while any resolution for his removal from office is under consideration in the House and shall, notwithstanding anything in article 100, be entitled to vote only in the first instance on such resolution or on any other matter during such proceedings but not in the case of an equality of votes.
Clauses not relevant here are left out.
Reading the text
“As soon as may be” in Article 93 sets no deadline for electing a Deputy Speaker. The post stayed vacant through the whole 17th Lok Sabha (2019–24) and remains vacant in the 18th.
The Speaker resigns to the Deputy Speaker, and vice versa; not to the President.
Removal needs “a majority of all the then members”, an effective majority, after 14 days’ notice.
The Speaker stays on after dissolution until the new House first meets (UPSC 2025).
During a motion for their own removal, the Speaker cannot preside but can speak and vote, in the first instance only, with no casting vote (Article 96(2); UPSC 2024).
The idea in brief
Each House has a presiding officer who runs the sittings like a referee.
Exam notes
Speaker
Elected by the Lok Sabha from its members. Resigns by writing to the Deputy Speaker(PYQ 2012). Removed by a resolution passed by a majority of all the then members, after 14 days’ notice(PYQ 2025)
During own removal
Cannot preside, but can speak and take part, and can vote in the first instance (not on a tie) (PYQ 2024)
On dissolution
Speaker continues until just before the first meeting of the new Lok Sabha (PYQ 2004, 2025)
Powers
Final say on whether a bill is a Money Bill; presides over joint sittings; casting vote on a tie; decides defection cases; appoints committee chairmen; can adjourn the House sine die
Deputy Speaker
Election date fixed by the Speaker (Rule 8). When presiding has the same powers as the Speaker; no appeal against rulings. No rule that the post goes to the Opposition: that is a convention only (PYQ 2017, 2022)
Speaker pro tem
Appointed by the President (usually the senior-most member) to swear in new members and conduct the Speaker’s election
Rajya Sabha
Chairman = Vice-President (ex officio, not a member); Deputy Chairman elected by the Rajya Sabha
In detail: First Speaker: G.V. Mavalankar(PYQ 2007). The Constitution does not require the Speaker to resign from the party (PYQ 2025). The Speaker does not hold office at the President’s pleasure and must already be a member when elected (PYQ 2012).
Speaker
No separate oath as Speaker; resigns to the Deputy Speaker; removed by majority of all the then members after 14 days’ notice (notice to the Secretary-General); continues after dissolution till the new House meets
Leader of Opposition
Statutory recognition 1977; party needs one-tenth of seats (Speaker’s direction)
Remember itSpeaker in three lines: resigns to the Deputy Speaker; removed by a majority of all members after 14 days’ notice; stays on after dissolution till the new House meets. During his own removal he can vote, but never a casting vote.
Beyond the basics · ranker’s edge
Point
Depth
Speaker’s salary
Charged on the Consolidated Fund of India, so it is not voted on by Parliament
Panel of Chairpersons
Up to 10 members nominated by the Speaker preside in the absence of the Speaker and Deputy Speaker
Deputy Speaker vacancy
Not elected in the 17th Lok Sabha (2019–24) and still vacant in the 18th. Article 93 says the House “shall” choose one but fixes no time limit
18th Lok Sabha
Om Birla re-elected Speaker in June 2024 by voice vote against an Opposition candidate; Bhartruhari Mahtab was pro tem Speaker
Rajya Sabha
Vice-President C.P. Radhakrishnan (elected September 2025 after Jagdeep Dhankhar resigned in July 2025) is Chairman; Harivansh is Deputy Chairman
Speaker vs Chairman on removal
Vice-President: effective majority of the Rajya Sabha, agreed to by the Lok Sabha (simple majority)
In depth: the story behind it and how UPSC asks it
The story behind it
The office predates the Constitution. Vithalbhai Patel became the first elected Indian President of the Central Legislative Assembly in 1925. G.V. Mavalankar, the first Speaker of the Lok Sabha (UPSC 2007), set many conventions, including the Speaker’s political neutrality. The Speaker’s powers have grown well beyond presiding: certifying Money Bills (Article 110(3)), deciding defection cases (Tenth Schedule) and presiding over joint sittings (Article 118(4)). That growth is why the impartiality of the office is debated so often.
How UPSC asks it
UPSC 2025 Consider the following statements: I. On the dissolution of the House of the People, the Speaker shall not vacate his/her office until immediately before the first meeting of the House of the People after the dissolution. II. According to the provisions of the Constitution of India, a Member of the House of the People on being elected as Speaker shall resign from his/her political party immediately. III. The Speaker of the House of the People may be removed from his/her office by a resolution of the House of the People passed by a majority of all the then Members of the House, provided that no resolution shall be moved unless at least fourteen days' notice has been given of the intention to move the resolution. Which of the statements given above are correct?
I and II only
II and III only
I and III only
I, II and III
Show answer(c) I and III only. I and III are from Article 94. II is wrong: the Constitution does not require the Speaker to leave the party.
UPSC 2024 With reference to the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, consider the following statements: While any resolution for the removal of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha is under consideration:
He/she shall not preside.
He/she shall not have the right to speak.
He/she shall not be entitled to vote on the resolution in the first instance.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
1 and 2 only
2 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3
Show answer(a) 1 only. Article 96: the Speaker cannot preside, but can speak and take part and can vote in the first instance (not on a tie).
UPSC 2022 With reference to Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha, consider the following statements:
As per the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, the election of Deputy Speaker shall be held on such date as the Speaker may fix.
There is a mandatory provision that the election of a candidate as Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha shall be from either the principal opposition party or the ruling party.
The Deputy Speaker has the same powers as of the Speaker when presiding over the sitting of the House and no appeal lies against his rulings.
The well established parliamentary practice regarding the appointment of Deputy Speaker is that the motion is moved by the Speaker and duly seconded by the Prime Minister.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
1 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3
3 and 4 only
2 and 4 only
Show answer(a) 1 and 3 only. Rule 8 lets the Speaker fix the date; when presiding the Deputy Speaker has the Speaker’s powers. There is no mandatory party rule, and the Speaker does not move the motion.
UPSC 2012 Regarding the office of the Lok Sabha Speaker, consider the following statements:
He/She holds the office during the pleasure of the President.
He/She need not be a member of the House at the time of his/her election but has to become a member of the House within six months from the date of his/her election.
If he/she intends to resign, the letter of his/her resignation has to be addressed to the Deputy Speaker.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 and 2 only
3 only
1, 2 and 3
None
Show answer(b) 3 only. The Speaker is elected by the House from among its members and does not serve at the President’s pleasure. Only 3 is correct.
UPSC 2007 Who was the Speaker of the First Lok Sabha?
Hukum Singh
G.V. Mavalankar
K. M. Munshi
U.N. Dhebar
Show answer(b) G.V. Mavalankar. G.V. Mavalankar (1952–56) was the first Speaker; Hukum Singh was a later Speaker (1962–67).
3. Sessions and passage of bills
The bare text
Bare text · Article 85Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
[85. Sessions of Parliament, prorogation and dissolution.—(1) The President shall from time to time summon each House of Parliament to meet at such time and place as he thinks fit, but six months shall not intervene between its last sitting in one session and the date appointed for its first sitting in the next session.
(2) The President may from time to time—
(a) prorogue the Houses or either House;
(b) dissolve the House of the People.]
Amended by: 1st (1951) Amendment
Bare text · Article 107Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
(3) A Bill pending in Parliament shall not lapse by reason of the prorogation of the Houses.
(4) A Bill pending in the Council of States which has not been passed by the House of the People shall not lapse on a dissolution of the House of the People.
(5) A Bill which is pending in the House of the People, or which having been passed by the House of the People is pending in the Council of States, shall, subject to the provisions of article 108, lapse on a dissolution of the House of the People.
Clauses not relevant here are left out.
Bare text · Article 108Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
108. Joint sitting of both Houses in certain cases.—(1) If after a Bill has been passed by one House and transmitted to the other House—
(a) the Bill is rejected by the other House; or
(b) the Houses have finally disagreed as to the amendments to be made in the Bill; or
(c) more than six months elapse from the date of the reception of the Bill by the other House without the Bill being passed by it, the President may, unless the Bill has elapsed by reason of a dissolution of the House of the People, notify to the Houses by message if they are sitting or by public notification if they are not sitting, his intention to summon them to meet in a joint sitting for the purpose of deliberating and voting on the Bill:
Provided that nothing in this clause shall apply to a Money Bill.
(4) If at the joint sitting of the two Houses the Bill, with such amendments, if any, as are agreed to in joint sitting, is passed by a majority of the total number of members of both Houses present and voting, it shall be deemed for the purposes of this Constitution to have been passed by both Houses:
Clauses not relevant here are left out.
Reading the text
Article 85: the gap between sessions may not exceed six months, so Parliament must meet at least twice a year. The three-session pattern of Budget, Monsoon and Winter is convention.
Article 107 is the lapse table in three sentences. Prorogation never kills a Bill. Dissolution kills Bills pending in the Lok Sabha, and Bills passed by it but pending in the Rajya Sabha. A Bill pending only in the Rajya Sabha, never passed by the Lok Sabha, survives (UPSC 2016, 2024).
Article 108: three triggers for a joint sitting: rejection, disagreement on amendments, or six months’ delay. The proviso excludes Money Bills. Constitutional amendments are excluded because Article 368 requires each House to pass them separately.
Joint sitting majority: a simple majority of members of both Houses present and voting (UPSC 2015), with the Speaker presiding.
The idea in brief
Parliament meets in sessions. The President calls (summons) Parliament, and the gap between two sessions cannot be more than six months. Usually there are three sessions a year: Budget, Monsoon and Winter.
How a bill becomes a law: a bill is introduced in one House, debated, passed, then sent to the other House. When both Houses pass it, it goes to the President. After the President’s assent, it becomes an Act.
What if the Houses disagree?For an ordinary bill, the President can call a joint sitting of both Houses, chaired by the Speaker. Because the Lok Sabha has more members, it usually wins. This has happened only three times (1961, 1978, 2002).
Exam notes
Summoning
By the President, at a time and place he thinks fit; gap between two sessions not more than six months. Three sessions a year is a convention only; no minimum sitting days (PYQ 2020)
Adjournment
By the presiding officer; ends a sitting. Adjournment sine die ends a session without a new date
Prorogation
By the President on ministerial advice; ends a session. Can be done even while the House is sitting (PYQ 2024)
Dissolution
Only the Lok Sabha; by the President on advice, or automatically after five years (PYQ 2004)
Quorum
One-tenth of total members, including the presiding officer
Joint sitting (Art 108)
Only for ordinary bills (not Money Bills, not amendment bills). Called by the President, presided by the Speaker, passed by a simple majority of members present and voting(PYQ 2012, 2015). Held three times: 1961 Dowry Prohibition, 1978 Banking Service Commission (Repeal), 2002 POTA (PYQ 2003)
Private member’s bill
By any MP who is not a minister (elected or nominated). The last one passed by both Houses was in 1970(PYQ 2017)
On dissolution of the Lok Sabha, does the bill lapse?
Lapses?
Pending in the Lok Sabha (from either House)
Yes
Passed by the Lok Sabha, pending in the Rajya Sabha
Yes
Pending in the Rajya Sabha, not yet passed by the Lok Sabha
No
President has notified a joint sitting
No
Passed by both Houses, awaiting assent, or returned by the President
No
Prelims trap:Prorogation never kills a bill; only dissolution of the Lok Sabha does (PYQ 2016, 2024).
Lapse on dissolution
Bills pending in Lok Sabha, or passed by it and pending in Rajya Sabha, lapse; bills pending in Rajya Sabha not passed by Lok Sabha, bills awaiting assent and a notified joint sitting survive
How an ordinary bill becomes law
Introduction (first reading)In either House, by a minister or private member; published in the Gazette
Second readingGeneral discussion, possibly referred to a select, joint or standing committee; then clause-by-clause consideration
Third readingBill accepted or rejected as a whole; simple majority of members present and voting
Other HouseSame three stages; may pass, amend, reject, or keep it pending
Deadlock?If rejected, amendments not agreed or more than six months pass: President may call a joint sitting (Art 108)
President (Art 111)Assent, withhold, or return once for reconsideration
Remember itAdjourn = a sitting, prorogue = a session, dissolve = the House. Only dissolution kills bills, and only those pending in or passed by the Lok Sabha. Joint sittings: 1961, 1978, 2002 (Dowry, Banking Service Commission, POTA).
Beyond the basics · ranker’s edge
Point
Depth
Article 85
President summons, prorogues and dissolves. Article 100: decisions by majority of members present and voting; casting vote only on a tie
Joint sitting chair
Speaker; if absent, the Deputy Speaker; if he too is absent, the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha (Art 118(4)). The Chairman (VP) never presides
President’s options (Art 111)
Assent, withhold, or return once for reconsideration (not a Money Bill). The pocket veto used once: Zail Singh on the Indian Post Office (Amendment) Bill, 1986
Six-month gap
Applies to sessions, not sittings
Constitution Amendment Bills
No joint sitting; need special majority in each House separately
In depth: the story behind it and how UPSC asks it
The story behind it
Only three Bills have ever gone to a joint sitting: the Dowry Prohibition Bill (1961), the Banking Service Commission (Repeal) Bill (1978), and the Prevention of Terrorism Bill (2002). Because the Lok Sabha is more than twice the Rajya Sabha’s size, the joint sitting favours the Lok Sabha’s view. That is the main reason governments rarely need it.
How UPSC asks it
UPSC 2024 With reference to the Indian Parliament, consider the following statements:
A bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses on its dissolution.
A bill passed by the Lok Sabha and pending in the Rajya Sabha lapses on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
A bill in regard to which the President of India notified his/her intention to summon the Houses to a joint sitting lapses on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
1 and 2
2 and 3
3 only
Show answer(b) 1 and 2. Statements 1 and 2 are correct. A bill for which a joint sitting has been notified does not lapse.
UPSC 2024 With reference to the Parliament of India, consider the following statements:
Prorogation of a House by the President of India does not require the advice of the Council of Ministers.
Prorogation of a House is generally done after the House is adjourned sine die but there is no bar to the President of India prorogating the House which is in session.
Dissolution of the Lok Sabha is done by the President of India, who, save in exceptional circumstances, does so on the advice of the Council of Ministers.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
1 and 2
2 and 3
3 only
Show answer(c) 2 and 3. The President prorogues on ministerial advice, so 1 is wrong. Prorogation can happen even while the House is sitting, and dissolution is normally on advice.
UPSC 2020 Consider the following statements:
The President of India can summon a session of the Parliament at such a place as he/she thinks fit.
The Constitution of India provides for three sessions of the Parliament in a year, but it is not mandatory to conduct all three sessions.
There is no minimum number of days that the Parliament is required to meet in a year.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
2 only
1 and 3 only
2 and 3 only
Show answer(c) 1 and 3 only. Article 85 lets the President summon at any time and place; the only rule is a maximum six-month gap. Three sessions is a convention, not a constitutional provision.
UPSC 2017 With reference to the Parliament of India, consider the following statements:
A private member's bill is a bill presented by a Member of Parliament who is not elected but only nominated by the President of India.
Recently, a private member's bill has been passed in the Parliament of India for the first time in its history.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer(d) Neither 1 nor 2. A private member is any MP who is not a minister. Fourteen private members’ bills have become law; the last was in 1970.
UPSC 2016 Which of the following statements is/are correct?
A Bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses on its prorogation.
A Bill pending in the Rajya Sabha, which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha, shall not lapse on dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer(b) 2 only. Prorogation does not end pending bills. A bill pending in the Rajya Sabha, not passed by the Lok Sabha, survives dissolution.
UPSC 2015 When a bill is referred to a joint sitting of both the Houses of the Parliament, it has to be passed by
a simple majority of members present and voting
three-fourths majority of members present and voting
two-thirds majority of the Houses
absolute majority of the Houses
Show answer(a) a simple majority of members present and voting. Article 108(4): a majority of the total number of members of both Houses present and voting.
UPSC 2012 A deadlock between the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha calls for a joint sitting of the Parliament during the passage of
Ordinary Legislation
Money Bill
Constitution Amendment Bill
1 only
2 and 3 only
1 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3
Show answer(a) 1 only. There is no joint sitting for Money Bills (Lok Sabha prevails) or amendment bills (each House must pass separately).
UPSC 2004 Consider the following statements:
The Speaker of Lok Sabha has the power to adjourn the House sine die but, on prorogation, it is only the President who can summon the House.
Unless sooner dissolved or there is an extension of the term, there is an automatic dissolution of the Lok Sabha by efflux of time, at the end of the period of five years, even if no formal order of dissolution is issued by the President.
The Speaker of Lok Sabha continues in office even after the dissolution of the House and until immediately before the first meeting of the House.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
1 and 2
2 and 3
1 and 3
1, 2 and 3
Show answer(d) 1, 2 and 3. All three are correct: sine die adjournment by the Speaker, automatic dissolution after five years, and the Speaker’s continuation under Article 94.
UPSC 2003 Consider the following statements:
The joint sitting of the two houses of the Parliament in India is sanctioned under Article 108 of the Constitution.
The first joint sitting of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha was held in the year 1961.
The second joint sitting of the two Houses of Indian Parliament was held to pass the Banking Service Commission (Repeal) Bill.
Which of these statements is correct?
1 and 2
2 and 3
1 and 3
1, 2 and 3
Show answer(d) 1, 2 and 3. Article 108; first joint sitting 1961 (Dowry Prohibition Bill); second 1978 (Banking Service Commission Repeal Bill). Third: 2002, POTA.
4. Money Bills and the Budget
The bare text
Bare text · Article 110Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
110. Definition of “Money Bills”.—(1) For the purposes of this Chapter, a Bill shall be deemed to be a Money Bill if it contains only provisions dealing with all or any of the following matters, namely:—
(a) the imposition, abolition, remission, alteration or regulation of any tax;
(b) the regulation of the borrowing of money or the giving of any guarantee by the Government of India, or the amendment of the law with respect to any financial obligations undertaken or to be undertaken by the Government of India;
(c) the custody of the Consolidated Fund or the Contingency Fund of India, the payment of moneys into or the withdrawal of moneys from any such Fund;
(d) the appropriation of moneys out of the Consolidated Fund of India;
(g) any matter incidental to any of the matters specified in sub-clauses (a) to (f).
(3) If any question arises whether a Bill is a Money Bill or not, the decision of the Speaker of the House of the People thereon shall be final.
Clauses not relevant here are left out.
Bare text · Article 109Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
109. Special procedure in respect of Money Bills.—(1) A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
(2) After a Money Bill has been passed by the House of the People it shall be transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations and the Council of States shall within a period of fourteen days from the date of its receipt of the Bill return the Bill to the House of the People with its recommendations and the House of the People may thereupon either accept or reject all or any of the recommendations of the Council of States.
(4) If the House of the People does not accept any of the recommendations of the Council of States, the Money Bill shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People without any of the amendments recommended by the Council of States.
(5) If a Money Bill passed by the House of the People and transmitted to the Council of States for its recommendations is not returned to the House of the People within the said period of fourteen days, it shall be deemed to have been passed by both Houses at the expiration of the said period in the form in which it was passed by the House of the People.
Clauses not relevant here are left out.
Bare text · Article 112Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
112. Annual financial statement.—(1) The President shall in respect of every financial year cause to be laid before both the Houses of Parliament a statement of the estimated receipts and expenditure of the Government of India for that year, in this Part referred to as the “annual financial statement”.
Clauses not relevant here are left out.
Amended by: 7th (1956) Amendment
Bare text · Article 114Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
(3) Subject to the provisions of articles 115 and 116, no money shall be withdrawn from the Consolidated Fund of India except under appropriation made by law passed in accordance with the provisions of this article.
Clauses not relevant here are left out.
Reading the text
“Contains only provisions”: a Bill is a Money Bill only if every provision is on the listed matters (taxes, borrowing, the Consolidated and Contingency Funds, appropriation) or incidental to them. A Bill with other substantive provisions is a financial Bill, not a Money Bill.
“The decision of the Speaker … shall be final”: this is the clause at the centre of the Money Bill controversy below.
Article 109: the Rajya Sabha can only recommend, within 14 days. The Lok Sabha may accept or reject the recommendations, and if the Rajya Sabha does nothing, the Bill is deemed passed (UPSC 2013, 2015, 2018).
“Budget” is not a word in the Constitution: Article 112 calls it the “annual financial statement”.
Article 114(3) is the core of financial control: no money leaves the Consolidated Fund without a law, the Appropriation Act (UPSC 2011).
The idea in brief
A Money Bill deals only with taxes, government borrowing and spending from government funds. It has special rules:
The Budget is officially called the “Annual Financial Statement” (Article 112). It shows the government’s expected income and spending for the year. Only the Lok Sabha votes on the demands for money.
Exam notes
Money Bill (Art 110)
Contains only matters like taxes, borrowing, custody of and payment into or withdrawal from the Consolidated or Contingency Fund, appropriation from the Consolidated Fund. Spending from the Contingency Fund is not a Money Bill matter (PYQ 2018)
Procedure (Art 109)
Introduced only in the Lok Sabha with the President’s recommendation. Rajya Sabha must return it in 14 days with recommendations; cannot amend or reject; Lok Sabha may accept or reject them (PYQ 2013, 2024). Speaker’s certificate is final; President cannot return it
Finance Bill
Art 117(1): introduced only in the Lok Sabha on recommendation, but otherwise treated as an ordinary bill: the Rajya Sabha can amend or reject it, and a joint sitting is possible (not necessary) (PYQ 2023)
Budget (Art 112)
“Annual Financial Statement”, laid before both Houses on the President’s behalf. No demand for grant except on the President’s recommendation(PYQ 2024)
Voting
Demands for grants voted only by the Lok Sabha; the Rajya Sabha can discuss the Budget (PYQ 2015). Charged expenditure is discussed, not voted. Cut motions: policy cut (₹1), economy cut, token cut (₹100)
Funds
Consolidated Fund (Art 266(1)): all revenues and loans; withdrawal needs Parliament’s law (PYQ 2011). Public Account (266(2)): money held in trust (PF, deposits); no vote needed. Contingency Fund (267): at the President’s disposal for emergencies. Each State has all three
Vote on account
Art 116: Lok Sabha grants money in advance for part of the year; deals with expenditure only. An interim budget covers both receipts and expenditure; either kind of government can use both (PYQ 2011)
In detail: The Macro-Economic Framework Statement is laid because the FRBM Act, 2003 requires it (PYQ 2020). If the Lok Sabha rejects the Budget, the government has lost confidence and the Council of Ministers resigns (PYQ 2011). India has no Parliamentary Budget Office (PYQ 2012).
Money Bill (Arts 109, 110)
Lok Sabha onlyIntroduced by a minister, on the President’s recommendation; Speaker certifies it as a Money Bill
Lok Sabha passesSimple majority
Rajya Sabha: 14 daysCan only recommend changes; cannot amend or reject. If it does not return the bill in 14 days, it is deemed passed
Lok Sabha decidesMay accept or reject any recommendations
PresidentAssents or withholds; cannot return it
Stages of the Budget in Parliament
PresentationAnnual Financial Statement (Art 112) on 1 February
General discussionBoth Houses discuss the Budget as a whole; no voting
Committee scrutinyDepartmentally related standing committees examine demands for grants
Voting on demandsLok Sabha only; cut motions; guillotine on the last day
Appropriation BillAuthorises withdrawal from the Consolidated Fund (Art 114)
Finance BillGives effect to tax proposals; to be passed within 75 days
Remember itMoney Bill = Lok Sabha only, President’s recommendation, Speaker certifies, Rajya Sabha 14 days, no joint sitting, no return by the President. Funds: Consolidated (needs a law), Public Account (no vote), Contingency (President’s disposal).
Beyond the basics · ranker’s edge
Point
Depth
Three types of financial bills
Money Bill (110); Financial Bill I (117(1): has a 110 matter plus other matters; Lok Sabha only, Presidential recommendation, otherwise ordinary); Financial Bill II (117(3): involves Consolidated Fund spending; can start in either House; recommendation needed for consideration)
Money Bill certification
Aadhaar Act upheld as a Money Bill (Puttaswamy, 2018); Rojer Mathew (2019) referred the scope of the Speaker’s certificate to a seven-judge Bench
Presentation → general discussion → DRSC scrutiny → voting on demands (guillotine at the end) → Appropriation Bill → Finance Bill (to be passed within 75 days, Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931)
Other grants
Supplementary, additional and excess grants (Art 115; excess grant needs PAC approval first). Vote on account, vote of credit, exceptional grant (Art 116)
Contingency Fund of India
Corpus raised from ₹500 crore to ₹30,000 crore (Finance Act, 2021). Budget on 1 February and Railway Budget merged since 2017
In depth: the story behind it and how UPSC asks it
The story behind it
Parliament’s control of money goes back to the English principle of “no taxation without representation”, and only the elected House holds it. The modern dispute is over the Speaker’s certificate. The Aadhaar Act (2016) was passed as a Money Bill, bypassing the Rajya Sabha. The Supreme Court upheld it 4:1 in 2018, with Justice Chandrachud dissenting that the certification was a fraud on the Constitution. In Rojer Mathew (2019) a five-judge bench referred the question, whether a Speaker’s Money Bill certificate can be reviewed, to a larger bench, where it remains pending.
How UPSC asks it
UPSC 2024 With reference to Union Budget, consider the following statements:
The Union Finance Minister on behalf of the Prime Minister lays the Annual Financial Statement before both the Houses of Parliament.
At the Union level, no demand for a grant can be made except on the recommendation of the President of India.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer(b) 2 only. The Budget is laid on behalf of the President (Article 112), not the Prime Minister. Statement 2 is Article 113(3).
UPSC 2024 Which of the following statements are correct in respect of a Money Bill in the Parliament?
Article 109 mentions special procedure in respect of Money Bills.
A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
The Rajya Sabha can either approve the Bill or suggest changes but cannot reject it.
Amendments to a Money Bill suggested by the Rajya Sabha have to be accepted by the Lok Sabha.
1 and 2 only
2 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3
1, 3 and 4
Show answer(c) 1, 2 and 3. 1, 2 and 3 are correct. The Lok Sabha may accept or reject the Rajya Sabha’s recommendations.
UPSC 2023 With reference to the Finance Bill and Money Bill in the Indian Parliament, consider the following statements:
When the Lok Sabha transmits the Finance Bill to the Rajya Sabha, it can amend or reject the Bill.
When the Lok Sabha transmits the Money Bill to the Rajya Sabha, it cannot amend or reject the Bill; it can only make recommendations.
In the case of disagreement between the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, there is no joint sitting for the Money Bill, but a joint sitting becomes necessary for the Finance Bill.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Only one
Only two
All three
None
Show answer(b) Only two. 1 and 2 are correct. For a Finance Bill a joint sitting is possible, not necessary.
UPSC 2020 Along with the Budget, the Finance Minister also places other documents before the Parliament which include 'The Macro Economic Framework Statement'. The aforesaid document is presented because this is mandated by:
Long standing parliamentary convention
Article 112 and Article 110(1) of the Constitution of India
Article 113 of the Constitution of India
Provisions of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003
Show answer(d) Provisions of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003. The FRBM Act, 2003 requires three statements with the Budget, including the Macro-Economic Framework Statement.
UPSC 2018 Regarding Money Bill, which of the following statements is not correct?
A bill shall be deemed to be a Money Bill if it contains only provisions relating to imposition, abolition, remission, alteration or regulation of any tax.
A Money Bill has provisions for the custody of the Consolidated Fund of India or the Contingency Fund of India.
A Money Bill is concerned with the appropriation of money out of the Contingency Fund of India.
A Money Bill deals with the regulation of borrowing of money or giving of any guarantee by the Government of India.
Show answer(c) A Money Bill is concerned with the appropriation of money out of the Contingency Fund of India. Article 110 covers appropriation from the Consolidated Fund, not the Contingency Fund.
UPSC 2015 Consider the following statements:
The Rajya Sabha has no power either to reject or to amend a Money Bill.
The Rajya Sabha cannot vote on the Demands for Grants.
The Rajya Sabha cannot discuss the Annual Financial Statement.
1 only
1 and 2 only
2 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3
Show answer(b) 1 and 2 only. The Rajya Sabha can discuss the Budget; it only cannot vote on demands or reject/amend Money Bills.
UPSC 2013 What will follow if a Money Bill is substantially amended by the Rajya Sabha?
The Lok Sabha may still proceed with the Bill, accepting or not accepting the recommendations of the Rajya Sabha
The Lok Sabha cannot consider the Bill further
The Lok Sabha may send the Bill to the Rajya Sabha for reconsideration
The President may call a joint sitting for passing the Bill
Show answer(a) The Lok Sabha may still proceed with the Bill, accepting or not accepting the recommendations of the Rajya Sabha. The Rajya Sabha’s ‘amendments’ are only recommendations; the Lok Sabha may accept or reject them.
UPSC 2012 Which of the following are the methods of Parliamentary control over public finance in India?
Placing Annual Financial Statement before the Parliament.
Withdrawal of money from Consolidated Fund of India only after passing the Appropriation Bill.
Provisions of supplementary grants and vote-on-account.
A periodic or at least a mid-year review of programme macroeconomic forecasts and expenditure by a Parliamentary Budget Office.
Introducing the Finance Bill in the Parliament.
1, 2, 3 and 5 only
1, 2 and 4 only
3, 4 and 5 only
1, 2, 3, 4 and 5
Show answer(a) 1, 2, 3 and 5 only. India has no Parliamentary Budget Office, so 4 is wrong. The rest are standard financial controls.
UPSC 2011 When the annual Union Budget is not passed by the Lok Sabha:
The Budget is modified and presented again
The Budget is referred to the Rajya Sabha for suggestions
The Union Finance Minister is asked to resign
The Prime Minister submits the resignation of Council of Ministers
Show answer(d) The Prime Minister submits the resignation of Council of Ministers. Defeat of the Budget means loss of the Lok Sabha’s confidence; the whole Council of Ministers resigns.
UPSC 2011 What is the difference between 'vote-on-account' and 'interim budget'?
The provision of a 'vote-on-account' is used by a regular Government, while an 'interim budget' is a provision used by a caretaker Government.
A 'vote-on-account' only deals with the expenditure in the Government's budget, while an 'interim budget' includes both expenditure and receipts.
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer(b) 2 only. Both tools can be used by either kind of government. A vote-on-account covers only expenditure; an interim budget covers receipts too.
UPSC 2011 The authorization for the withdrawal of funds from the Consolidated Fund of India must come from:
The President of India
The Parliament of India
The Prime Minister of India
The Union Finance Minister
Show answer(b) The Parliament of India. Article 114(3): no money can be withdrawn except under appropriation made by law, i.e., by Parliament.
UPSC 2011 All revenues received by the Union Government by way of taxes and other receipts for the conduct of Government business are credited to the:
Contingency Fund of India
Public Account
Consolidated Fund of India
Deposits and Advances Fund
Show answer(c) Consolidated Fund of India. Article 266(1): all revenues, loans raised and repayments received go to the Consolidated Fund.
UPSC 2004 With reference to Indian public finance, consider the following statements:
Disbursements from Public Accounts of India are subject to the Vote of the Parliament.
The Indian Constitution provides for the establishment of a Consolidated Fund, a Public Account and a Contingency Fund for each State.
Appropriations and disbursements under the Railway Budget are subject to the same form of parliamentary control as other appropriations and disbursements.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
1 and 2
2 and 3
1 and 3
1, 2 and 3
Show answer(b) 2 and 3. Public Account payments are made by executive action without a vote, so 1 is wrong. 2 and 3 are correct (the Railway Budget is now merged with the General Budget since 2017).
UPSC 2000 Which one of the following statements about a Money Bill is not correct?
A Money Bill can be tabled in either House of Parliament
The Speaker of Lok Sabha is the final authority to decide whether a Bill is a Money Bill or not
The Rajya Sabha must return a Money Bill passed by the Lok Sabha and send it for consideration within 14 days.
The President cannot return a Money Bill to the Lok Sabha for reconsideration.
Show answer(a) A Money Bill can be tabled in either House of Parliament. A Money Bill can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha.
5. Parliamentary devices and control over the executive
The bare text
Bare text · Article 75Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
(3) The Council of Ministers shall be collectively responsible to the House of the People.
Clauses not relevant here are left out.
Amended by: 91st (2003) Amendment
Bare text · Article 118Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
118. Rules of procedure.—(1) Each House of Parliament may make rules for regulating, subject to the provisions of this Constitution, its procedure and the conduct of its business.
Clauses not relevant here are left out.
Reading the text
The whole toolkit of parliamentary control rests on two lines. Article 75(3) says the government answers to the Lok Sabha. Article 118(1) lets each House make its own rules. Question Hour, Zero Hour, adjournment motions, calling-attention notices, no-confidence motions and short-duration discussions are not in the Constitution. They come from the Rules of Procedure. UPSC’s 2014 question, “there is no mention of a No-Confidence Motion in the Constitution”, tests exactly this.
The idea in brief
In a parliamentary system, the government must answer to Parliament every day. MPs use several tools:
Question typesStarred questions get an oral answer in the House (with follow-up questions). Unstarred questions get a written answer. A trick to remember: the star means “speak”.
Indian innovation; not mentioned in the rules; starts after Question Hour
Adjournment motion
Discussion on a definite matter of urgent public importance; needs 50 members; Lok Sabha only; involves an element of censure (PYQ 2012)
No-confidence motion
Not in the Constitution (Rule 198); Lok Sabha only; needs 50 members; no need to state grounds(PYQ 2004, 2014)
Censure motion
Must state reasons; can be against one minister or the whole Council; passing it does not force resignation
Calling attention
Indian innovation, in the rules; draws a minister’s attention to an urgent matter
Leader of Opposition
First recognised in 1969; given statutory status in 1977. The 10% rule is a convention, not law (PYQ 2018)
In detail: Parliament controls the executive mainly through committees, questions, motions and debates (PYQ 2001, 2017). When the Speaker asks a member to stop so that another may speak, the member is yielding the floor(PYQ 2000). Funds under MPLADS are for durable community assets, with at least 15% for SC and 7.5% for ST areas; funds are non-lapsable(PYQ 2020).
Device
Point
Starred / unstarred questions
Starred: oral answer, supplementaries allowed · Unstarred: written answer, no supplementaries · Short notice: under 10 days (PYQ 2026)
Zero Hour
Informal, since 1962; not in the Rules
Adjournment motion
Needs 50 members; Lok Sabha only; at least 2.5 hours’ debate; element of censure
Rule 193
Short duration discussion without a vote
Calling attention
Indian innovation (1954)
Remember itStar = speak (starred = oral answer with supplementaries). 50 members for adjournment and no-confidence motions; both are Lok Sabha only, and no-confidence needs no reasons while censure does.
Beyond the basics · ranker’s edge
Device
Depth
Motion of Thanks
On the President’s address (Art 87); defeat means defeat of the government
Other devices
Half-an-hour discussion; special mention (RS); point of order; privilege motion; “no-day-yet-named” motion
No-confidence history
First: 1963 (J.B. Kripalani against Nehru). Most recent: August 2023, defeated by voice vote. Governments that lost a confidence vote: V.P. Singh (1990), Deve Gowda (1997), Vajpayee (1999, by one vote)
MPLADS
₹5 crore per MP per year; suspended 2020–22; nominated MPs can choose works anywhere in India
Prelims trap: Unstarred = written; no supplementary on unstarred questions. (PYQ 2026) Confidence motion is moved by the government; no-confidence by the Opposition; neither is in the Constitution.
In depth: the story behind it and how UPSC asks it
The story behind it
The first no-confidence motion was moved by J.B. Kripalani against Nehru’s government in 1963, after the war with China. Only one government has lost a no-confidence or confidence vote by a single vote: Vajpayee’s in April 1999. Zero Hour is an Indian innovation of the early 1960s, named for its start at 12 noon, and is not in the rules at all. The Rajya Sabha has no power to remove a government; it can question and debate, but a no-confidence motion lies only in the Lok Sabha.
How UPSC asks it
UPSC 2026 Consider the following statements in respect of questions asked by the Members in the Parliament of India:
Unstarred questions are those to which a Member desires an oral answer in the House.
Starred questions are those to which a Member desires a written answer.
No supplementary question can be asked on an unstarred question.
Which one of the following conclusions based on the above statements is correct?
All the three statements are correct.
There are two correct statements, that include statement 2.
There is only one correct statement.
There is no correct statement.
Show answer(c) There is only one correct statement. Statements 1 and 2 are reversed: starred questions get oral answers and allow supplementaries; unstarred questions get written answers. Statement 3 is correct, since supplementaries cannot follow a written answer.
UPSC 2020 With reference to the funds under Members of Parliament Local Area Development Scheme (MPLADS), which of the following statements are correct?
MPLADS funds must be used to create durable assets like physical infrastructure for health, education, etc.
A specified portion of each MP fund must benefit SC/ST populations.
MPLADS funds are sanctioned on yearly basis and the unused funds cannot be carried forward to the next year.
The district authority must inspect at least 10% of all works under implementation every year.
1 and 2 only
3 and 4 only
1, 2 and 3 only
1, 2 and 4 only
Show answer(d) 1, 2 and 4 only. Funds are for durable assets; 15% for SC and 7.5% for ST areas; district authorities inspect at least 10% of works. Funds are non-lapsable, so 3 is wrong.
UPSC 2018 Consider the following statements:
In the first Lok Sabha, the single largest party in the opposition was the Swatantra Party.
In the Lok Sabha, a 'Leader of the Opposition' was recognised for the first time in 1969.
In the Lok Sabha, if a party does not have a minimum of 75 members, its leader cannot be recognised as the Leader of the Opposition.
1 and 3 only
2 only
2 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3
Show answer(b) 2 only. The largest opposition party in 1952 was the CPI (Swatantra was founded in 1959). The 10% (55 seats) practice is a convention; there is no 75-member rule.
UPSC 2017 The Parliament of India exercises control over the functions of the Council of Ministers through
Adjournment motion
Question hour
Supplementary questions
1 only
2 and 3 only
1 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3
Show answer(d) 1, 2 and 3. All three are devices of parliamentary control over the executive.
UPSC 2014 Consider the following statements regarding a No-Confidence Motion in India:
There is no mention of a No-Confidence Motion in the Constitution of India.
A motion of No-Confidence can be introduced in the Lok Sabha only.
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer(c) Both 1 and 2. Article 75 speaks of collective responsibility; the motion itself is in the Lok Sabha’s rules (Rule 198) and only the Lok Sabha can pass it.
UPSC 2012 In the Parliament of India, the purpose of an adjournment motion is
to allow a discussion on a definite matter of urgent public importance.
to let opposition members collect information from the ministers.
to allow a reduction of specific amounts in demand for grants.
to postpone the proceedings to check the inappropriate or violent behaviour on the part of some members.
Show answer(a) to allow a discussion on a definite matter of urgent public importance. It interrupts normal business to discuss a definite matter of urgent public importance. (c) describes a cut motion.
UPSC 2004 Which one of the following statements is not correct?
In the Lok Sabha, a no-confidence motion has to set out the grounds on which it is based
In the case of a no-confidence motion in Lok Sabha, no conditions of admissibility have been laid down in the Rules
A motion of no-confidence once admitted, has to be taken up within ten days of the leave being granted
Rajya Sabha is not empowered to entertain a motion of no-confidence
Show answer(a) In the Lok Sabha, a no-confidence motion has to set out the grounds on which it is based. A no-confidence motion need not state any grounds. A censure motion must state reasons.
UPSC 2001 In what way does the Indian Parliament exercise control over the administration?
Through Parliamentary Committees
Through Consultative Committees in various ministries
By making the administrators send periodic reports
By compelling the executive to issue writs
Show answer(a) Through Parliamentary Committees. Financial and standing committees give Parliament continuous, detailed oversight of administration.
UPSC 2000 The Speaker can ask a member of the House to stop speaking and let another member speak. This phenomenon is known as:
decorum
crossing the floor
interpellation
yielding the floor
Show answer(d) yielding the floor. Yielding the floor: giving up one’s turn to another speaker. Crossing the floor means changing sides.
6. Parliamentary committees
The bare text
Bare text · Article 118Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
118. Rules of procedure.—(1) Each House of Parliament may make rules for regulating, subject to the provisions of this Constitution, its procedure and the conduct of its business.
Clauses not relevant here are left out.
The idea in brief
Parliament is too big to examine everything in detail, so small groups of MPs called committees do the detailed work.
Exam notes
Committee
Members
Key facts
Public Accounts (PAC)
22: 15 Lok Sabha + 7 Rajya Sabha; no outsiders
Set up 1921. Examines CAG reports, appropriation and finance accounts. Chairman appointed by the Speaker, by convention from the Opposition since 1967 (PYQ 2007, 2013)
Estimates
30, all from the Lok Sabha
Largest committee; suggests economies (PYQ 2003, 2014)
Public Undertakings
22: 15 + 7
Examines reports and accounts of PSUs
Departmentally Related Standing Committees
24 committees, 31 members each (21 + 10)
Since 1993; examine demands for grants and bills; review regulators (PYQ 2019)
Subordinate Legislation
15 in each House
Checks whether rules and regulations made under delegated power stay within it (PYQ 2018)
Ethics
Lok Sabha: ad hoc 2000, permanent 2015
Complaint by any person through an MP or by an MP; does not take up sub-judice matters (PYQ 2024)
Prelims trap: PAC has 22 members, not 25; Estimates has no Rajya Sabha members. Ad hoc committees and DRSCs, not the Finance Commission or NITI Aayog, review regulators.
Committee
Composition / note
PAC (1921)
15 LS + 7 RS; chairman from Opposition since 1967; ministers excluded
Estimates (1950)
30, all Lok Sabha; ‘continuous economy committee’
COPU
15 LS + 7 RS
Welfare of SCs and STs
20 LS + 10 RS; chair appointed by the Speaker; ministers excluded; one-year term (PYQ 2026)
DRSCs (1993)
24 committees of 31 (21 LS + 10 RS); 8 under the Rajya Sabha
Speaker chairs
Business Advisory, Rules, General Purposes Committees
Set up on John Mathai‘s recommendation; ministers cannot be members
COPU (1964)
On the Krishna Menon Committee’s recommendation
DRSCs
17 in 1993, 24 since 2004: 16 under the Lok Sabha, 8 under the Rajya Sabha
Joint Parliamentary Committees
Ad hoc: Bofors (1987), Harshad Mehta (1992), Ketan Parekh (2001), 2G (2011); Waqf (Amendment) Bill (2024–25); One Nation One Election bills (2024)
Welfare of SCs and STs
30 members (20 LS, 10 RS); Speaker appoints the chair; ministers excluded
Ethics
Its report led to Mahua Moitra’s expulsion (December 2023)
In depth: the story behind it and how UPSC asks it
The story behind it
Committees do most of Parliament’s detailed work, and almost none are in the Constitution. They come from the Rules of Procedure under Article 118.
Public Accounts Committee: the oldest financial committee, set up in 1921 under the Montagu-Chelmsford reforms. Since 1967 its chairman has been from the opposition by convention, because it examines the government’s spending as audited by the CAG.
Estimates Committee (1950): Lok Sabha members only, and the largest committee, with 30 members (UPSC 2014).
Committee on Public Undertakings (1964), on the Krishna Menon Committee’s advice.
Departmentally Related Standing Committees (1993): 24 committees, each shadowing a group of ministries. They examine Bills and demands for grants, extending scrutiny to areas the House has no time for. Independent regulators come under these committees’ review (UPSC 2019).
How UPSC asks it
UPSC 2026 Consider the following statements about the Committee on the Welfare of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes of the Parliament of India:
Although members of this Committee are elected from both Houses of Parliament, the Chairperson of this Committee is appointed by the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.
Twenty members are elected by the Rajya Sabha and ten members by the Lok Sabha.
No Minister, except for the Union Minister of Social Justice and Empowerment, is eligible to become a member of this Committee.
Members are elected for a fixed term of two years from the date they enter their office.
Which one of the following conclusions based on the above statements is correct?
There are four correct statements.
There is only one correct statement, that is statement 2.
There are two correct statements, that include statement 1.
There is no correct statement.
Show answer(d) There is no correct statement. All four are wrong. The Committee has 30 members: 20 from the Lok Sabha and 10 from the Rajya Sabha. The Speaker appoints the Chairperson. No Minister can be a member. The term is not more than one year.
UPSC 2024 Which of the following statements about the Ethics Committee in the Lok Sabha are correct?
Initially, it was an ad-hoc Committee.
Only a Member of the Lok Sabha can make a complaint relating to the unethical conduct of a member of the Lok Sabha.
This Committee cannot take up any matter which is sub-judice.
1 and 2 only
2 and 3 only
1 and 3 only
1, 2 and 3
Show answer(c) 1 and 3 only. It began as an ad hoc committee in 2000 and became permanent in 2015. Any person can complain through an MP, so 2 is wrong. It does not take up sub-judice matters.
UPSC 2019 In India, which of the following review the independent regulators in sectors like telecommunications, insurance, electricity, etc.?
Ad Hoc Committee set up by the Parliament
Parliamentary Department Related Standing Committee
Finance Commission
Financial Sector Legislative Reforms Commission
NITI Aayog
1 and 2
1, 3 and 4
3, 4 and 5
2 and 5
Show answer(a) 1 and 2. Parliament reviews regulators through its committees. The Finance Commission, FSLRC and NITI Aayog have no such role.
UPSC 2018 With reference to the Parliament of India, which of the following Parliamentary Committees scrutinises and reports to the House whether the powers to make regulations, rules, sub-rules, by-laws, etc. conferred by the Constitution or delegated by the Parliament are being properly exercised by the Executive within the scope of such delegation?
Committee on Government Assurances
Committee on Subordinate Legislation
Rules Committee
Business Advisory Committee
Show answer(b) Committee on Subordinate Legislation. The Committee on Subordinate Legislation checks delegated legislation.
UPSC 2014 Which one of the following is the largest Committee of the Parliament?
The Committee on Public Accounts
The Committee on Estimates
The Committee on Public Undertakings
The Committee on Petitions
Show answer(b) The Committee on Estimates. The Estimates Committee has 30 members, all from the Lok Sabha.
UPSC 2013 Consider the following statements. The Parliamentary Committee on Public Accounts:
Consists of not more than 25 Members of the Lok Sabha.
Scrutinises appropriation and finance accounts of the Government.
Examines the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.
1 only
2 and 3 only
3 only
1, 2 and 3
Show answer(b) 2 and 3 only. PAC has 22 members (15 + 7). It examines appropriation and finance accounts and CAG reports.
UPSC 2007 Consider the following statements:
The Chairman of the Committee on Public Accounts is appointed by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha.
The Committee on Public Accounts comprises Members of Lok Sabha, Members of Rajya Sabha and few eminent persons of industry and trade.
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer(a) 1 only. The Speaker appoints the chairman. There are no outside members.
UPSC 2003 Consider the following statements:
While members of the Rajya Sabha are associated with Committees on Public Accounts and Public Undertakings, members of Committee on Estimates are drawn entirely from the Lok Sabha.
The Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs works under the overall direction of Cabinet Committee on Parliamentary Affairs.
The Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs nominates Members of Parliament on Committees, Councils, Boards and Commissions etc. set up by the Government of India in the various ministries.
1 and 2
2 and 3
1 and 3
1, 2 and 3
Show answer(d) 1, 2 and 3. All three are correct.
7. Powers of the two Houses, privileges and anti-defection
The bare text
Bare text · Article 105Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
105. Powers, privileges, etc., of the Houses of Parliament and of the members and committees thereof.—(1) Subject to the provisions of this Constitution and to the rules and standing orders regulating the procedure of Parliament, there shall be freedom of speech in Parliament.
(2) No member of Parliament shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said or any vote given by him in Parliament or any committee thereof, and no person shall be so liable in respect of the publication by or under the authority of either House of Parliament of any report, paper, votes or proceedings.
[(3) In other respects, the powers, privileges and immunities of each House of Parliament, and of the members and the committees of each House, shall be such as may from time to time be defined by Parliament by law, and, until so defined, [shall be those of that House and of its members and committees immediately before the coming into force of section 15 of the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978.]].
Clauses not relevant here are left out.
Amended by: 42nd (1976), 44th (1978) Amendments
Bare text · Tenth Schedule, paragraph 2Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
2. Disqualification on ground of defection.—(1) Subject to the provisions of [paragraphs 4 and 5], a member of a House belonging to any political party shall be disqualified for being a member of the House—
(a) if he has voluntarily given up his membership of such political party; or
(b) if he votes or abstains from voting in such House contrary to any direction issued by the political party to which he belongs or by any person or authority authorised by it in this behalf, without obtaining, in either case, the prior permission of such political party, person or authority and such voting or abstention has not been condoned by such political party, person or authority within fifteen days from the date of such voting or abstention.
Amended by: 52nd (1985), 91st (2003) Amendments
Bare text · Tenth Schedule, paragraph 4(2)Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
(2) For the purposes of sub-paragraph (1) of this paragraph, the merger of the original political party of a member of a House shall be deemed to have taken place if, and only if, not less than two-thirds of the members of the legislature party concerned have agreed to such merger.
Bare text · Tenth Schedule, paragraphs 6 and 7Constitution of India, as on 1 May 2024
6. Decision on questions as to disqualification on ground of defection.—(1) If any question arises as to whether a member of a House has become subject to disqualification under this Schedule, the question shall be referred for the decision of the Chairman or, as the case may be, the Speaker of such House and his decision shall be final:
Provided that where the question which has arisen is as to whether the Chairman or the Speaker of a House has become subject to such disqualification, the question shall be referred for the decision of such member of the House as the House may elect in this behalf and his decision shall be final.
(2) All proceedings under sub-paragraph (1) of this paragraph in relation to any question as to disqualification of a member of a House under this Schedule shall be deemed to be proceedings in Parliament within the meaning of article 122 or, as the case may be, proceedings in the Legislature of a State within the meaning of article 212.
*7. Bar of jurisdiction of courts.—Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, no court shall have any jurisdiction in respect of any matter connected with the disqualification of a member of a House under this Schedule.
* Paragraph 7 declared invalid for want of ratification in accordance with the proviso to clause (2) of article 368 as per majority opinion in Kihoto Hollohon Vs. Zachilhu and Others A.I.R. 1993 SC 412.
Reading the text
Article 105(3), “until so defined”: Parliament has never defined its privileges by law. They remain those that existed in 1978, rooted in British parliamentary practice.
Tenth Schedule paragraph 2 has two grounds: voluntarily giving up membership, which courts infer from conduct and not just formal resignation, and defying the party whip in a vote, unless condoned within 15 days.
Paragraph 4: merger needs two-thirds of the legislature party. The older “split” exception (one-third), in paragraph 3, was deleted by the 91st Amendment (2003); the bare text shows its absence with asterisks.
Paragraphs 6 and 7: the Speaker or Chairman decides, and courts were barred. The official footnote records that paragraph 7 was declared invalid in Kihoto Hollohan (1992), because it was passed without State ratification.
The idea in brief
Privileges are special protections for MPs, such as free speech inside the House: an MP cannot be sued for what he says there.
The anti-defection law (Tenth Schedule, 1985) stops MPs and MLAs from switching parties after being elected. If they do, they lose their seat. The Speaker or Chairman decides.
Exam notes
Lok Sabha only
Money Bills start here; votes on demands for grants; no-confidence motion(PYQ 2022); resolution to disapprove continuance of a National Emergency
Rajya Sabha only
Art 249: resolution by two-thirds of members present and voting lets Parliament legislate on a State List subject in the national interest; Art 312: create new All-India Services; resolution to remove the Vice-President starts here (PYQ 2006, 2012, 2016)
Equal powers
Constitutional amendments, election and impeachment of the President, approval of emergencies, removal of judges (PYQ 2020)
Privileges (Art 105)
Freedom of speech in Parliament; no court case for anything said or any vote given; not codified
Anti-defection
Tenth Schedule, 52nd Amendment 1985; brought the words “political party” into the Constitution. 91st Amendment 2003 removed the one-third split exception; a two-thirds merger is protected. A nominated member can join a party within 6 months; an independent cannot join any party
Deciding authority
Speaker/Chairman. No time limit in the law (PYQ 2022); Kihoto Hollohan (1992): decision open to judicial review
In detail, women’s reservation: The 106th Amendment, 2023 reserves one-third of seats in the Lok Sabha, State Assemblies and the Delhi Assembly for women, to start after the next census and delimitation, for 15 years. Before it, the 1997 PYQ point held: such reservation needed an amendment, while parties could field women voluntarily (PYQ 1997).
Sita Soren (2024)
Seven judges: no immunity for bribery linked to a vote or speech (overruled P.V. Narasimha Rao, 1998)
Keisham Meghachandra (2020)
Speaker should decide defection petitions within three months
Subhash Desai (2023)
Political party, not just the legislature party, appoints the whip
Remember itRajya Sabha’s special powers: 249 (State subject), 312 (new All-India Service), VP removal starts there. Lok Sabha alone: money, no-confidence, ending an Emergency. Anti-defection: two-thirds merger survives; split clause gone (2003).
Beyond the basics · ranker’s edge
Point
Depth
Privileges source
Art 105(3): as defined by Parliament; until then, as they stood on the 44th Amendment’s commencement (earlier: as of the House of Commons)
Raja Ram Pal (2007)
Expulsion of MPs (cash-for-query) upheld; court can review for gross illegality
Tenth Schedule paragraphs
Para 2(1)(a) voluntarily giving up membership; 2(1)(b) defying the whip unless condoned within 15 days; Para 4 merger (two-thirds); Para 6 Speaker decides; Para 7 (bar on courts) struck down in Kihoto Hollohan (1992)
91st Amendment (2003)
Removed the split clause; capped ministries at 15% of the House (Art 75(1A), 164(1A)); defectors barred from ministerial posts until re-elected
106th Amendment (2023)
Articles 330A, 332A, 334A, 239AA(2)(ba); quota within SC/ST seats too; no OBC sub-quota; not for the Rajya Sabha or Legislative Councils; lasts 15 years
Prelims trap: No time limit for defection decisions in the Schedule; Keisham Meghachandra (2020) suggested three months. (PYQ 2022)
In depth: the story behind it and how UPSC asks it
The story behind it
“Aaya Ram, Gaya Ram” became the phrase for defection after Gaya Lal, a Haryana MLA, switched parties repeatedly within days in 1967. The 52nd Amendment (1985) brought in the Tenth Schedule. In Kihoto Hollohan (1992), the Supreme Court upheld the Speaker’s role but made decisions open to judicial review. In Keisham Meghachandra (2020) it said disqualification petitions should ordinarily be decided within three months. On privileges, Sita Soren (2024): seven judges overruled the 1998 P.V. Narasimha Rao judgment and held that an MP or MLA who takes a bribe to vote or speak gets no immunity under Article 105 or 194.
How UPSC asks it
UPSC 2025 Consider the following statements: I. If any question arises as to whether a Member of the House of the People has become subject to disqualification under the 10th Schedule, the President's decision in accordance with the opinion of the Council of Union Ministers shall be final. II. There is no mention of the word 'political party' in the Constitution of India.
I only
II only
Both I and II
Neither I nor II
Show answer(d) Neither I nor II. Defection questions are decided by the Speaker. The 52nd Amendment (Tenth Schedule) brought ‘political party’ into the Constitution.
UPSC 2024 Consider the following statements regarding 'Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam':
Provisions will come into effect from the 18th Lok Sabha.
This will be in force for 15 years after becoming an Act.
There are provisions for the reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes Women within the quota reserved for the Scheduled Castes.
1, 2 and 3
1 and 2 only
2 and 3 only
1 and 3 only
Show answer(c) 2 and 3 only. Reservation starts only after the next census and delimitation, so not from the 18th Lok Sabha. It lasts 15 years and includes SC/ST women within their quotas.
UPSC 2022 Which of the following is/are the exclusive power(s) of Lok Sabha?
To ratify the declaration of Emergency
To pass a motion of no-confidence against the Council of Ministers
To impeach the President of India
1 and 2
2 only
1 and 3
3 only
Show answer(b) 2 only. Both Houses approve Emergency and both take part in impeachment. Only the Lok Sabha can pass a no-confidence motion.
UPSC 2022 With reference to anti-defection law in India, consider the following statements:
The law specifies that a nominated legislator cannot join any political party within six months of being appointed to the House.
The law does not provide any timeframe within which the presiding officer has to decide a defection case.
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer(b) 2 only. A nominated member may join a party within six months; after that he is disqualified if he joins. There is no time limit for the presiding officer.
UPSC 2020 Rajya Sabha has equal powers with Lok Sabha in
the matter of creating new All India Services
amending the Constitution
the removal of the government
making cut motions
Show answer(b) amending the Constitution. Amendment bills need each House’s special majority. Creating new All-India Services is a special Rajya Sabha power; removal of government and cut motions belong to the Lok Sabha.
UPSC 2012 Which of the following special powers have been conferred on the Rajya Sabha by the Constitution of India?
To change the existing territory of a State and to change the name of a State.
To pass a resolution empowering the Parliament to make laws in the State List and to create one or more All India Services.
To amend the election procedure of the President and to determine the pension of the President after his/her retirement.
To determine the functions of the Election Commission and determine the number of Election Commissioners.
Show answer(b) To pass a resolution empowering the Parliament to make laws in the State List and to create one or more All India Services. Articles 249 and 312.
UPSC 2006 Consider the following statements:
The Rajya Sabha alone has the power to declare that it would be in national interest for the Parliament to legislate with respect to a matter in the State List.
Resolutions approving the proclamation of Emergency are passed only by the Lok Sabha.
1 only
2 only
Both 1 and 2
Neither 1 nor 2
Show answer(a) 1 only. Article 249 is a Rajya Sabha power. Emergency proclamations are approved by both Houses.
UPSC 1997 Assertion (A): Reservation of thirty-three percent of seats for women in Parliament and State Legislature does not require any Constitutional amendment. Reason (R): Political parties contesting elections can allocate thirty-three percent of seats they contest to women candidates without any Constitutional amendment.
Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A
Both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A
A is true but R is false
A is false but R is true
Show answer(d) A is false but R is true. Reserving seats needs an amendment (done by the 106th Amendment, 2023). Parties can field women voluntarily without any amendment.
8. Quick revision and traps
Exam notes
25 / 30
Minimum age: Lok Sabha / Rajya Sabha
14 days
Rajya Sabha’s time on a Money Bill; also notice to remove the Speaker
50 members
Support needed for adjournment and no-confidence motions
22 / 30 / 22
PAC / Estimates / Public Undertakings
1961, 1978, 2002
The three joint sittings
Beyond the basics · ranker’s edge
PYQ pattern
How to prepare
Speaker’s powers and removal
Asked in 2012, 2024, 2025: removal majority, voting rights, continuation after dissolution
Money vs Finance Bill
Make a three-column table: who introduces, Rajya Sabha’s power, joint sitting
Devices and committees
2026 asked question types and the SC/ST Welfare Committee in “how many correct” format